Re: Temporary tables under hot standby

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Temporary tables under hot standby
Date: 2012-06-08 17:38:19
Message-ID: CA+U5nMKE9N2kQ4=bHd_vPCa_d-Rp82j=rYX76ipkfpef0UU6NA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 8 June 2012 18:26, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> I would be more open to warning people about CREATE GLOBAL TEMP TABLE
> - frankly, it's pretty wonky that we allow that but treat GLOBAL as a
> noise word in this first place.  But I'm a little disinclined to have
> the message speculate about what might happen in future versions of
> PostgreSQL.  Such predictions don't have a very good track record of
> being accurate.

Agreed.

We should make use of GLOBAL throw an ERROR: feature not yet
implemented, in preparation for what might one day happen. We don't
know the future but we do know the present.

--
 Simon Riggs                   http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
 PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Fetter 2012-06-08 17:41:33 Re: New Postgres committer: Kevin Grittner
Previous Message Robert Haas 2012-06-08 17:26:20 Re: Temporary tables under hot standby