Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: pgsql: More duplicate word removal.

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Peter Geoghegan <peter(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com>, Robert Haas <rhaas(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-committers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pgsql: More duplicate word removal.
Date: 2012-05-02 16:35:10
Message-ID: CA+TgmoYbMv-QgQCQbmcDO57kGK1t5oT4qz9cqD77PYCoFxWQKA@mail.gmail.com (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committers
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 12:29 PM, Peter Geoghegan <peter(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> On 2 May 2012 14:43, Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com> wrote:
>> "in" looks like an unnecessary duplicate, but maybe someone who speaks
>> Italian can confirm.
>
> Gabriele Bartolini, a prominent contributor to the .it translation and
> a colleague of mine, confirms privately that it's an error.

That needs to be fixed through the translations system.  Otherwise,
the next update from the translations system will overwrite any change
we make in git.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

pgsql-committers by date

Next:From: Alvaro HerreraDate: 2012-05-02 16:36:54
Subject: Re: pgsql: More duplicate word removal.
Previous:From: Peter GeogheganDate: 2012-05-02 16:29:32
Subject: Re: pgsql: More duplicate word removal.

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group