From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Geoghegan <peter(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com>, Robert Haas <rhaas(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-committers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: pgsql: More duplicate word removal. |
Date: | 2012-05-02 16:35:10 |
Message-ID: | CA+TgmoYbMv-QgQCQbmcDO57kGK1t5oT4qz9cqD77PYCoFxWQKA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-committers |
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 12:29 PM, Peter Geoghegan <peter(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> On 2 May 2012 14:43, Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com> wrote:
>> "in" looks like an unnecessary duplicate, but maybe someone who speaks
>> Italian can confirm.
>
> Gabriele Bartolini, a prominent contributor to the .it translation and
> a colleague of mine, confirms privately that it's an error.
That needs to be fixed through the translations system. Otherwise,
the next update from the translations system will overwrite any change
we make in git.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2012-05-02 16:36:54 | Re: pgsql: More duplicate word removal. |
Previous Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2012-05-02 16:29:32 | Re: pgsql: More duplicate word removal. |