On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 5:45 PM, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote:
> Actually, for the future, it might be useful to have a "state" column,
> that holds the idle/in transaction/running status, instead of the
> tools having to parse the query text to get that information...
+1 for doing it this way. Splitting "current_query" into "query" and
"state" would be more elegant and easier to use all around.
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Mark Mielke||Date: 2011-10-31 22:18:40|
|Subject: Re: Thoughts on "SELECT * EXCLUDING (...) FROM ..."?|
|Previous:||From: Jaime Casanova||Date: 2011-10-31 21:59:34|
|Subject: Re: IDLE in transaction introspection|