Re: [PATCH] Generic type subscription

From: Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Aleksander Alekseev <a(dot)alekseev(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
Cc: Victor Wagner <vitus(at)wagner(dot)pp(dot)ru>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Generic type subscription
Date: 2016-11-17 11:56:11
Message-ID: CA+q6zcWqj16BU+DSAa-wsLUWgHi6R_7VsCnqDq-2BX4sC32gSA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> On 15 November 2016 at 15:03, Aleksander Alekseev <
a(dot)alekseev(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> wrote:
> Hello.
>
> I took a look on the latest -v4 patch. I would like to note that this
> patch breaks a backward compatibility. For instance sr_plan extension[1]
> stop to compile with errors

Thank you for the feedback.

Well, if we're speaking about this particular extension, if I understood
correctly, it fetches all parse tree nodes from Postgres and generates code
using this information. So to avoid compilation problems I believe you need
to
run `make USE_PGXS=1 genparser` again (it worked for me, I don't see any
mentions of `ArrayRef`).

But speaking generally, I don't see how we can provide backward
compatibility
for those extensions, who are strongly coupled with implementation details
of
parsing tree. I mean, in terms of interface it's mostly about to replace
`ArrayRef` to `SubscriptingRef`, but I think it's better to do it in the
extension code.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kyotaro HORIGUCHI 2016-11-17 12:24:06 Re: A bug in UCS_to_most.pl
Previous Message Mithun Cy 2016-11-17 11:33:15 Re: Patch: Implement failover on libpq connect level.