Re: Versioning policy PgJDBC - discussion

From: Jorge Solórzano <jorsol(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Dave Cramer <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com>
Cc: Gavin Flower <GavinFlower(at)archidevsys(dot)co(dot)nz>, List <pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Vladimir Sitnikov <sitnikov(dot)vladimir(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Versioning policy PgJDBC - discussion
Date: 2016-11-30 04:00:24
Message-ID: CA+cVU8Ozc2FFS5bbd8z+8WYs+Vc0_AKEq1eyYKYCb2PysEDQBg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-jdbc

Good to know Dave, I was not aware about the multi-jar in Java 9.

El mar., 29 de nov. de 2016 7:32 PM, Dave Cramer <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com>
escribió:

On 29 November 2016 at 18:54, Jorge Solórzano <jorsol(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

Or better yet, simply append .jre8 to the version, that way 42.0.0.jre8 >
42.0.0.jre7 > 42.0.0.jre6 and when Java 9 comes out it will be easy to use
.jre9 and there will be no problem to identify what Java version it target.

Once we go to java 9 we won't need to, it supports versioned jars, we've
had this discussion before.
http://postgresql.nabble.com/Maven-Artifact-JDK-Suffix-td5881398.html

Dave

--

Jorge Solórzano
me.jorsol.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-jdbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Manoj Palhade 2016-11-30 11:18:21 Database reset connection
Previous Message Mithun Cy 2016-11-30 01:44:29 Re: Patch: Implement failover on libpq connect level.