| From: | Steve Kehlet <steve(dot)kehlet(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Forums postgresql <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Re: 9.4.1 -> 9.4.2 problem: could not access status of transaction 1 |
| Date: | 2015-05-29 21:32:41 |
| Message-ID: | CA+bfosH6Vsmu0OvO-31s4qVMYjfQXueT-9Mtbo4nyZU33Rrs_Q@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 12:08 PM Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> OK, here's a patch.
>
I grabbed branch REL9_4_STABLE from git, and Robert got me a 9.4-specific
patch. I rebuilt, installed, and postgres started up successfully! I did a
bunch of checks, had our app run several thousand SQL queries against it,
had a colleague check it out, and it looks good. Looking at top and ps, I
don't see anything funny (e.g. no processes spinning cpu, etc), things look
normal. Let me know if I can provide anything else.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2015-05-29 22:29:46 | Re: Re: [GENERAL] 9.4.1 -> 9.4.2 problem: could not access status of transaction 1 |
| Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2015-05-29 21:14:31 | Re: Re: [GENERAL] 9.4.1 -> 9.4.2 problem: could not access status of transaction 1 |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2015-05-29 21:35:00 | Re: RFC: Remove contrib entirely |
| Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2015-05-29 21:14:37 | Re: [CORE] postpone next week's release |