| From: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-committers <pgsql-committers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: pgsql: Stamp 9.1.8. |
| Date: | 2013-02-04 21:54:01 |
| Message-ID: | CA+U5nMLmV+1y+XKf5eyWkvQtZDFv=_=gkT_3TBNjL5DqfMzsmw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers |
On 4 February 2013 21:48, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> wrote:
> We should really freeze the code for 24 hours shouldn't we? That way
> we know most, if not all of the buildfarm animals will have had a
> chance to go red since the last code change.
Do whatever you like, as long as you tell me about it.
--
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2013-02-04 22:12:23 | Re: pgsql: Stamp 9.1.8. |
| Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2013-02-04 21:49:31 | Re: pgsql: Stamp 9.1.8. |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jeff Janes | 2013-02-04 21:59:57 | Re: autovacuum not prioritising for-wraparound tables |
| Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2013-02-04 21:49:31 | Re: pgsql: Stamp 9.1.8. |