Re: Considering Gerrit for CFs

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
To: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
Cc: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Daniel Farina <daniel(at)heroku(dot)com>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Considering Gerrit for CFs
Date: 2013-02-09 09:25:14
Message-ID: CA+U5nMLfAWhYps3pagKg-x5A7Z5WT9GFg=pV5cAaMKmnG5pmUg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-www

On 8 February 2013 10:23, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote:

>> to solve two problems:
>>
>> 1. maximize the efficiency of existing reviewer time
>>
>> 2. make tooling not be an obstacle to getting new reviewers
>
> I think you are missing a fundamental part in this - which is "0.
> don't negatively affect the efficiency of existing committer time".

Agreed.

Process improvement is very important, but not more important than the
process itself.

What is the developer meeting for if not this discussion?

Let's do some patch reviews and commits now and save the
lets-make-it-better stufff for later.

--
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alexander Korotkov 2013-02-09 09:36:03 Re: SP-GiST for ranges based on 2d-mapping and quad-tree
Previous Message Miroslav Šimulčík 2013-02-09 09:13:23 Re: function for setting/getting same timestamp during whole transaction

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Magnus Hagander 2013-02-11 20:12:09 Re: almost hidden placement of release support policy
Previous Message Daniel Farina 2013-02-09 06:55:40 Re: Considering Gerrit for CFs