Re: proposal: ANSI SQL 2011 syntax for named parameters

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: proposal: ANSI SQL 2011 syntax for named parameters
Date: 2013-02-06 18:06:36
Message-ID: CA+U5nMLPkXdHVz2tokYHhCVYrhPZcR8h8Vg4F7XOOLMsepOvRg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 6 February 2013 17:43, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 3:32 PM, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>> On 4 February 2013 19:53, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>> This seems pretty close to an accusation of bad faith, which I don't
>>> believe to be present.
>>
>> Robert, this is not an accusation of bad faith, just an observation
>> that we can move forwards more quickly.
>
> It's your opinion, to which you are certainly entitled, but it is not
> an observation of an objective fact.

And what? You expressed an opinion, as did I.

I repeat: I don't see why waiting a year changes anything here. Can
you please explain why the situation is improved by waiting a year?

--
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Heikki Linnakangas 2013-02-06 18:47:39 Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Fast promote mode skips checkpoint at end of recovery.
Previous Message Robert Haas 2013-02-06 18:02:17 Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Fast promote mode skips checkpoint at end of recovery.