From: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: proposal: ANSI SQL 2011 syntax for named parameters |
Date: | 2013-02-06 18:06:36 |
Message-ID: | CA+U5nMLPkXdHVz2tokYHhCVYrhPZcR8h8Vg4F7XOOLMsepOvRg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 6 February 2013 17:43, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 3:32 PM, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>> On 4 February 2013 19:53, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>> This seems pretty close to an accusation of bad faith, which I don't
>>> believe to be present.
>>
>> Robert, this is not an accusation of bad faith, just an observation
>> that we can move forwards more quickly.
>
> It's your opinion, to which you are certainly entitled, but it is not
> an observation of an objective fact.
And what? You expressed an opinion, as did I.
I repeat: I don't see why waiting a year changes anything here. Can
you please explain why the situation is improved by waiting a year?
--
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2013-02-06 18:47:39 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Fast promote mode skips checkpoint at end of recovery. |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2013-02-06 18:02:17 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Fast promote mode skips checkpoint at end of recovery. |