Re: Future In-Core Replication

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Future In-Core Replication
Date: 2012-05-03 17:22:08
Message-ID: CA+U5nMLO4iTKXQXf8XV1cswAqoBi17MG6aHAB5TWbVqjRyRv-A@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 6:03 PM, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> wrote:

> I do agree that depending on user-defined PKs raises a whole host of
> issues which we'd rather just sidestep, though.

What do you have in mind instead?

--
 Simon Riggs                   http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
 PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2012-05-03 17:22:24 Re: Advisory locks seem rather broken
Previous Message Magnus Hagander 2012-05-03 17:21:53 Re: "unexpected EOF" messages