Re: Latch for the WAL writer - further reducing idle wake-ups.

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Peter Geoghegan <peter(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PG Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Latch for the WAL writer - further reducing idle wake-ups.
Date: 2012-05-07 19:22:14
Message-ID: CA+U5nMLE68LOopu5Djf1Sc5TUy5sv-3ayaFCdv8EBvipNNViEQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 7 May 2012 20:06, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> writes:
>> It also leaves the situation that we have a catalog view called
>> pg_stat_bgwriter that would be accessing "checkpointer" things. That's
>> really the thorny one that I wasn't sure how to handle. Good example
>> of why we shouldn't expose internals too much.
>
> Yeah, that's a bit unfortunate but changing it doesn't seem like a good
> idea.  The names I intended to change are all internal.

OK, I'll change just the internal names.

--
 Simon Riggs                   http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
 PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2012-05-07 19:59:02 Re: c-function variants running time
Previous Message Tom Lane 2012-05-07 19:06:50 Re: Latch for the WAL writer - further reducing idle wake-ups.