Re: LWLOCK_STATS

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: LWLOCK_STATS
Date: 2012-01-07 10:24:38
Message-ID: CA+U5nMKrkO1=OScMRXnVFH11SdzYCX=RSZWesRnkK0F2zsM4rg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 10:24 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

>  Five-minute pgbench run, scale factor 100,
> permanent tables, my usual config settings.  Somewhat depressingly,
> virtually all of the interesting activity still centers around the
> same three locks

We've seen clear evidence that the performance profile changes over
time, with certain artifacts becoming more prominent.

Running exactly the same tests repeatedly is useful to derive the
historical perspectives, but we need a wider spread of tests to be
certain that the work done is generally applicable.

I'd be interested to see results from a 30 minute run, focusing on
what happens in minutes 10-30, if you have time.

--
 Simon Riggs                   http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
 PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Heikki Linnakangas 2012-01-07 10:26:42 Re: 16-bit page checksums for 9.2
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2012-01-07 10:14:30 Re: 16-bit page checksums for 9.2