Re: Performance Improvement by reducing WAL for Update Operation

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, amit(dot)kapila(at)huawei(dot)com, hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com, noah(at)leadboat(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Performance Improvement by reducing WAL for Update Operation
Date: 2013-01-11 14:34:33
Message-ID: CA+U5nMKVMJk=XbSOi34vTr_HYiLs+jkVGPjj2VHsv4Bp8qnB9g@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 11 January 2013 14:29, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:

> But that doesn't include columns changed by triggers, AFAIR, so you
> could only use that if there weren't any triggers.

True, well spotted

--
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Steve Singer 2013-01-11 14:56:56 AIX buildfarm member
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2013-01-11 14:29:49 Re: Performance Improvement by reducing WAL for Update Operation