| From: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com>, PGSQL Mailing List <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: VACUUM touching file but not updating relation |
| Date: | 2011-11-18 15:25:12 |
| Message-ID: | CA+U5nMKL39n+7FazhwZZWD6p9ZLdgd-izEPToM1jnSSVRqTe4Q@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 3:18 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> What Thom's complaining about is that the buffer may be marked dirty
> unnecessarily, ie when there has been no actual data change.
OK, I'll patch it.
--
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bill Thoen | 2011-11-18 15:54:30 | Re: Using the internal data dictionary |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2011-11-18 15:18:46 | Re: VACUUM touching file but not updating relation |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2011-11-18 15:33:13 | Re: range_adjacent and discrete ranges |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2011-11-18 15:18:46 | Re: VACUUM touching file but not updating relation |