From: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
Cc: | Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: ALTER TABLE lock strength reduction patch is unsafe |
Date: | 2012-01-02 19:54:33 |
Message-ID: | CA+U5nMJeavFtk9N4w-a6Sd0W7scmH=aweY+YwO1B2HGmVLdfAQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Jan 2, 2012 at 7:49 PM, Alvaro Herrera
<alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
>
> Excerpts from Noah Misch's message of lun ene 02 16:39:09 -0300 2012:
>>
>> On Mon, Jan 02, 2012 at 04:33:28PM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>
>> > Uh, I thought detoasting had its own visibility test function .. I mean,
>> > otherwise, what is HeapTupleSatisfiesToast for?
>>
>> The SnapshotNow scan was actually to build the relcache entry for the toast
>> table before scanning the toast table itself. Stack trace:
>
> Oh, right, that makes sense.
Certainly does. Thanks Noah, much appreciated.
--
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Pavel Stehule | 2012-01-02 20:05:39 | Re: SQL:2011 features |
Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2012-01-02 19:53:28 | Re: our buffer replacement strategy is kind of lame |