| From: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: SQL:2011 features |
| Date: | 2012-01-02 19:11:14 |
| Message-ID: | CA+U5nMJUcUUw64WHgnZyUs4zp4ueshUFXi221UQC_U2XAvjH-A@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Jan 2, 2012 at 6:47 PM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> wrote:
> On mån, 2012-01-02 at 09:33 +0000, Simon Riggs wrote:
>> Are there any features in SQL:2011 that we should be considering for 9.2?
>>
>> We seem quite close on temporal stuff, so maybe just a little syntax work?
>
> I am aware of this piece on what's new in SQL:2011:
> http://petereisentraut.blogspot.com/2010/04/news-from-sql-standard.html
I saw this as well, which seems quite different:
--
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2012-01-02 19:13:00 | Re: ALTER TABLE lock strength reduction patch is unsafe |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2012-01-02 18:47:40 | Re: SQL:2011 features |