| From: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andreas Karlsson <andreas(at)proxel(dot)se> |
| Cc: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: PATCH: Reducing lock strength of trigger and foreign key DDL |
| Date: | 2015-04-05 15:56:42 |
| Message-ID: | CA+U5nMJPn9hVBp3L0+wi7o2r7ouTVUUk=wWpGF5qPXkR9_BpAg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 7 February 2015 at 20:05, Andreas Karlsson <andreas(at)proxel(dot)se> wrote:
> On 01/30/2015 07:48 AM, Michael Paquier wrote:
>>
>> Looking at the latest patch, it seems that in
>> AlterTableGetLockLevel(at)tablecmds(dot)c we ought to put AT_ReAddConstraint,
>> AT_AddConstraintRecurse and AT_ProcessedConstraint under the same
>> banner as AT_AddConstraint. Thoughts?
>
>
> A new version of the patch is attached which treats them as the same for
> locking. I think it is correct and improves readability to do so.
Committed. We move forwards, slowly but surely. Thanks for the patch.
--
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, RemoteDBA, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2015-04-05 16:16:39 | Column mis-spelling hints vs case folding |
| Previous Message | Tomas Vondra | 2015-04-05 00:02:58 | Re: PATCH: nbklno in _hash_splitbucket unused (after ed9cc2b) |