Re: New versioning scheme

On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 10:53 AM, Greg Sabino Mullane <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com> wrote:
> Exactly. I think it is time for us to realize that our beloved "major.minor"
> versioning is a failure, both at a marketing and a technical level. It's a
> lofty idea, but causes way more harm than good in real life. People on
> pgsql-hackers know that 9.1 and 9.5 are wildly different beasts. Clients?
> They are running "Postgres 9". So I'm all in favor of doing away with
> major and minor.

I'm not. I've had people be confused about that, but not often.
Maybe my clients are smarter than yours. :-)

In my view, the principal advantage of the current system is that it
slow version number inflation. Bumping the first version number every
year causes you to burn through ten numbers a decade rather than ~2,
and I find that appealing.

But of course that's a matter of opinion.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company