Re: Proposal for changes to recovery.conf API

On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 10:11 AM, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net> wrote:
> On 9/6/16 8:07 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 9:45 PM, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
>> wrote:
>>> Related cleanup
>>> * Promotion signal file is now called "promote.trigger" rather than
>>> just "promote"
>>> * Remove user configurable "trigger_file" mechanism - use
>>> "promote.trigger" for all cases
>>
>>
>> I'm in favor of this. I don't think that it's very hard for authors
>> of backup tools to adapt to this new world, and I don't see that
>> allowing configurability here does anything other than create more
>> cases to worry about.
>
> +1 from a backup tool author.

It's time to wrap up this CommitFest, and this thread doesn't seem to
contain anything that looks like a committable patch. So, I'm marking
this "Returned with Feedback". I hope that the fact that there's been
no discussion for the last three weeks doesn't mean this effort is
dead; I would like very much to see it move forward.

Thanks,

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company