Re: WIP json generation enhancements

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: WIP json generation enhancements
Date: 2012-11-26 21:04:30
Message-ID: CA+TgmobZn0v6chhcD2STjwAEANfeB7eDUdYTW3Uu0J1ZvD36sQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 3:05 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> The analogy to other aggregates is probably a better thing to argue
> from. On the other hand, I don't know anyone outside the SQL standards
> committee who thinks it's actually a good idea that SUM() across no rows
> returns null rather than zero.

Me neither.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2012-11-26 21:10:48 Re: Removing PD_ALL_VISIBLE
Previous Message Robert Haas 2012-11-26 21:03:37 Re: Removing PD_ALL_VISIBLE