Re: increasing the default WAL segment size

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Beena Emerson <memissemerson(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)bluetreble(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: increasing the default WAL segment size
Date: 2017-01-27 22:29:44
Message-ID: CA+TgmobTJ1hSJNy4fjbA5eqqVvVi-gC7adJk9Uez9oDSMHSHrg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 8:53 PM, Michael Paquier
<michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> I've not done like the most careful review ever, but I'm in favor of the
>> general change (provided the byval thing is fixed obviously).
>
> Thanks for the review.

Why not use pg_ltoa and pg_lltoa like the output functions for the datatype do?

Might use CStringGetTextDatum(blah) instead of
PointerGetDatum(cstring_to_text(blah)).

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jim Nasby 2017-01-27 22:34:43 Re: Proposal : For Auto-Prewarm.
Previous Message Robert Haas 2017-01-27 22:23:51 Re: Typo in comment in postgres_fdw.c