Re: COPY FREEZE has no warning

On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 2:02 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
> As a reminder, COPY FREEZE still does not issue any warning/notice if
> the freezing does not happen:
>
> Requests copying the data with rows already frozen, just as they
> would be after running the <command>VACUUM FREEZE</> command.
> This is intended as a performance option for initial data loading.
> Rows will be frozen only if the table being loaded has been created
> in the current subtransaction, there are no cursors open and there
> are no older snapshots held by this transaction. If those conditions
> are not met the command will continue without error though will not
> freeze rows. It is also possible in rare cases that the request
> cannot be honoured for internal reasons, hence <literal>FREEZE</literal>
> is more of a guideline than a hard rule.
>
> Note that all other sessions will immediately be able to see the data
> once it has been successfully loaded. This violates the normal rules
> of MVCC visibility and by specifying this option the user acknowledges
> explicitly that this is understood.
>
> Didn't we want to issue the user some kind of feedback?

I believe that is what was agreed.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company