Re: Custom/Foreign-Join-APIs (Re: [v9.5] Custom Plan API)

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Kouhei Kaigai <kaigai(at)ak(dot)jp(dot)nec(dot)com>, Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com>, Shigeru Hanada <shigeru(dot)hanada(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Custom/Foreign-Join-APIs (Re: [v9.5] Custom Plan API)
Date: 2015-05-08 18:18:59
Message-ID: CA+TgmobRO64Fec+gaVjQzcCj4vTtxFQ6oiHOeuHP14EZDh4zNA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, May 8, 2015 at 1:46 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> That's nice, but 9.5 feature freeze is only a week away. I don't have a
> lot of confidence that this stuff is actually in a state where we won't
> regret shipping it in 9.5.

Yeah. The POC you were asking for upthread certainly exists and has
for a while, or I would not have committed this. But I do not think
it likely that the postgres_fdw support will be ready for 9.5.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2015-05-08 18:27:13 Re: multixacts woes
Previous Message Robert Haas 2015-05-08 18:15:44 multixacts woes