Re: pgindent fixups

On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 11:31 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 11:23 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>>> OK, I committed this. Barring objections, I'll go ahead and pgindent
>>> the whole tree tomorrow. If we're going to revert anything big then
>>> we might want to hold off, but otherwise I think its better to get
>>> this done sooner rather than later.
>>
>> Well, there are at least two patchsets we're actively discussing
>> reverting, so I think this should wait till those decisions are resolved.
>
> OK, but that may well mean we don't get this done before beta1, which
> I think is a bummer, but oh well.

So I really would like to get a pgindent run done. Any objections to
doing it sometime RSN? It is of course possible that it might make
something that we want to revert later harder to revert, but I think
we should just accept that risk and move forward.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company