Re: Raising our compiler requirements for 9.6

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Raising our compiler requirements for 9.6
Date: 2015-08-12 17:00:25
Message-ID: CA+TgmobE3Syonbhr6snimeMtKN1bJ0OEFg8b1ci+Hig4SrTMFA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 10:34 PM, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com> wrote:
>> In my opinion this drastically increases readability and thus should be
>> applied. Will do so sometime tomorrow unless there's protest.
>
> -1 to introducing more inline functions before committable code replaces what
> you've already pushed for this thread.

This appears to be intended as an insult, but maybe I'm misreading it.

I am not thrilled with the rate at which this stuff is getting whacked
around. Less-significant changes have been debated for far longer,
and I really doubt that the rate at which Andres is committing changes
in this area is healthy. I don't doubt that he has good intentions,
though.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Marko Tiikkaja 2015-08-12 17:18:41 count_nulls(VARIADIC "any")
Previous Message Robert Haas 2015-08-12 16:19:37 Re: WIP: SCRAM authentication