Re: Proposal: RETURNING primary_key()

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Igal (at) Lucee(dot)org" <igal(at)lucee(dot)org>, Ian Barwick <ian(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Proposal: RETURNING primary_key()
Date: 2016-03-09 13:30:44
Message-ID: CA+Tgmob4-4E75Ms97-5VXjiVbFLU8_4njg4DJebMvSqeHZqQ1w@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 8:12 PM, Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> There certainly are server/protocol frustrations.

I'm sympathetic to all of these and think we should work on fixing
them, particularly...

> STRING TYPE ISSUES
> ---
>
> PgJDBC can work around Pg's IMO somewhat overzealous type checks ...

This.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Kapila 2016-03-09 13:31:00 Re: RFC: replace pg_stat_activity.waiting with something more descriptive
Previous Message Robert Haas 2016-03-09 13:11:35 Re: Parallel Aggregate