| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Vinayak Pokale <vinpokale(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Konstantin Knizhnik <k(dot)knizhnik(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> |
| Subject: | Re: Transactions involving multiple postgres foreign servers |
| Date: | 2016-10-27 18:19:55 |
| Message-ID: | CA+Tgmob-yfFqNubi2vPPG+iV1z-SAfUTCfbS7HrF=zQrCdU3DQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 2:00 AM, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> I think we can consider the atomic commit and the atomic visibility
> separately, and the atomic visibility can build on the top of the
> atomic commit.
It is true that we can do that, but I'm not sure whether it's the best design.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Merlin Moncure | 2016-10-27 18:53:09 | Re: emergency outage requiring database restart |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2016-10-27 18:18:58 | Re: Transactions involving multiple postgres foreign servers |