Re: Parallel Seq Scan

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Haribabu Kommi <kommi(dot)haribabu(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Kouhei Kaigai <kaigai(at)ak(dot)jp(dot)nec(dot)com>, Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Fabrízio Mello <fabriziomello(at)gmail(dot)com>, Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Parallel Seq Scan
Date: 2015-03-19 15:12:11
Message-ID: CA+Tgmob+y0kY_rqXOVeDhTw5xwmAQi92t0OGgEQW6CwemkjVkA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 11:43 PM, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Patch fixes the problem and now for Rescan, we don't need to Wait
> for workers to finish.
>
>> Assuming this actually fixes the problem, I think we should back-patch
>> it into 9.4.
>
> +1

OK, done.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2015-03-19 15:21:45 flags argument for dsm_create
Previous Message Amit Kapila 2015-03-19 14:49:09 Re: assessing parallel-safety