| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Christoph Berg <cb(at)df7cb(dot)de>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [trivial patch] typo in doc/src/sgml/sepgsql.sgml |
| Date: | 2012-02-15 19:06:40 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmoajYZxCsuAMPWRFH3b3i3Ay+cBcjhu6xAy1nXWnpi3gPw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 1:45 PM, Alvaro Herrera
<alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
> Excerpts from Christoph Berg's message of mié feb 15 12:16:52 -0300 2012:
>> Re: Robert Haas 2012-02-15 <CA+TgmoZjUtSzHpXwwzcm4kJjwH__1AdMO3KoSbbQ+fHSCqpAKA(at)mail(dot)gmail(dot)com>
>> > Fixed, but note that I had to recreate the patch by manual
>> > examination. Including it inline tends to garble things.
>>
>> Hmm, I thought I had :set paste and everything...
>
> If you copied from a pager, those tend to expand tabs to spaces, so the
> patch gets mangled at that point. At least "less" does that. OTOH if
> you :r the patch file, it works fine.
It is also possible that my email client is to blame. All I know for
sure is I had to regenerate the patch.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2012-02-15 19:15:20 | Re: Assertion failure in AtCleanup_Portals |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2012-02-15 19:05:32 | Re: [v9.2] Add GUC sepgsql.client_label |