| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Pavan Deolasee <pavan(dot)deolasee(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Vlad Bailescu <vlad(at)mojitosoftware(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Turning auto-analyze off (was Re: [GENERAL] Unusually high IO for autovacuum worker) |
| Date: | 2013-02-04 15:35:17 |
| Message-ID: | CA+Tgmoad44xYo7MBdN2u3TywHz+Bxih6m3SwRU5JN0-kvLgzww@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 12:33 PM, Pavan Deolasee
<pavan(dot)deolasee(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> I can write a patch in next couple of days if we are willing to accept
> for this release. I think it should be fairly easy and non-intrusive.
I think it's too late to consider this for 9.3, but I think we should
entertain it for 9.4.
The biggest problem I see is that the naming of the new reloptions
might end up being something kind of unintuitive, like
autovacuum_vacuum_enabled and autovacuum_analyze_enabled. You need a
degree in PostgreSQLology to understand what that means, but I haven't
got a better idea.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2013-02-04 15:39:55 | Re: logical changeset generation v4 - Heikki's thoughts about the patch state |
| Previous Message | Miroslav Šimulčík | 2013-02-04 15:33:44 | Re: Audit Logs WAS: temporal support patch |