Re: postgres_fdw join pushdown (was Re: Custom/Foreign-Join-APIs)

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com>, Etsuro Fujita <fujita(dot)etsuro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Kouhei Kaigai <kaigai(at)ak(dot)jp(dot)nec(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Shigeru Hanada <shigeru(dot)hanada(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: postgres_fdw join pushdown (was Re: Custom/Foreign-Join-APIs)
Date: 2016-02-05 20:30:52
Message-ID: CA+Tgmoab6odjmmHNk3v3YEXf7Gd2X0_sd78DmKfccUAuoGwmbA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Feb 5, 2016 at 4:23 AM, Ashutosh Bapat
<ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
> I have corrected this in this set of patches. Also, I have included the
> change to build the join relation description while constructing fpinfo in
> the main patch since that avoids repeated building of the same at a small
> cost of constructing relation name for base relations, which goes waste if
> that relation is not going to be part of any pushable join tree.
>
> Ran pgindent as well.

pg_fdw_join_v9.patch does not aplpy.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2016-02-05 22:11:29 First-draft release notes for next week's back-branch releases
Previous Message Robert Haas 2016-02-05 20:25:44 Re: postgres_fdw join pushdown (was Re: Custom/Foreign-Join-APIs)