Re: Abbreviated keys for Numeric

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>
Cc: Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Gavin Flower <GavinFlower(at)archidevsys(dot)co(dot)nz>
Subject: Re: Abbreviated keys for Numeric
Date: 2015-03-24 00:54:39
Message-ID: CA+TgmoaY3KeS-DsoDWZuqG-jQFTrY7QVX90v1ms_tBH5+=RkgQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 4:03 PM, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com> wrote:
> I must also admit that I am somewhat annoyed here, since Andrew has
> questioned essentially ever revision I've proposed to both of the sort
> support patches he wrote, and in a rather bellicose way. They were
> mostly very modest revisions.

Yep, both of you are questioning each other's work, and both of you
are expressing your opposition to the other person's ideas in ways
that are fairly forceful, and I think it's fair to say that you are
both annoyed. Believe me, I've been there.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2015-03-24 01:02:08 Re: Abbreviated keys for Numeric
Previous Message Peter Geoghegan 2015-03-24 00:54:33 Re: Abbreviated keys for Numeric