Re: Torn page hazard in ginRedoUpdateMetapage()

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>
Cc: "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Torn page hazard in ginRedoUpdateMetapage()
Date: 2014-03-10 19:44:00
Message-ID: CA+TgmoaNS50=8EWD=JMVdtM0s+sHRO7TivQRCKNtW8tE4khGLw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 1:34 PM, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com> wrote:
> When GIN changes a metapage, we WAL-log its ex-header content and never use a
> backup block. This reduces WAL volume since the vast majority of the metapage
> is unused. However, ginRedoUpdateMetapage() only restores the WAL-logged
> content if the metapage LSN predates the WAL record LSN. If a metapage write
> tore and updated the LSN but not the other content, we would fail to complete
> the update. Instead, unconditionally reinitialize the metapage similar to how
> _bt_restore_meta() handles the situation.
>
> I found this problem by code reading and did not attempt to build a test case
> illustrating its practical consequences. It's possible that there's no
> problem in practice on account of some reason I haven't contemplated.

The attached patch doesn't apply any more, but it looks like this
issue still exists.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2014-03-10 19:46:52 Re: Changeset Extraction v7.9.1
Previous Message Andres Freund 2014-03-10 19:39:35 Re: Changeset Extraction v7.9.1