Re: Parallel Seq Scan

On Sat, Dec 6, 2014 at 12:13 AM, David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> It's bare-bones core support for allowing aggregate states to be merged
> together with another aggregate state. I would imagine that if a query such
> as:
>
> SELECT MAX(value) FROM bigtable;
>
> was run, then a series of parallel workers could go off and each find the
> max value from their portion of the table and then perhaps some other node
> type would then take all the intermediate results from the workers, once
> they're finished, and join all of the aggregate states into one and return
> that. Naturally, you'd need to check that all aggregates used in the
> targetlist had a merge function first.

I think this is great infrastructure and could also be useful for
pushing down aggregates in cases involving foreign data wrappers. But
I suggest we discuss it on a separate thread because it's not related
to parallel seq scan per se.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company