| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Petr Jelinek <petr(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Craig Ringer <craig(dot)ringer(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "Tsunakawa, Takayuki" <tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: autonomous transactions |
| Date: | 2016-09-13 23:31:18 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmoaKqLpwrMpbzsOPENYkRrpiUgo6P6qSxzCCnmPcKc+amg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 5:06 PM, Petr Jelinek <petr(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> I mostly agree. I think if this was called something like background
> transactions it might be better. It's definitely useful functionality but
> the naming is clearly contentious. It won't stop people using it for same
> use-cases as autonomous transactions though (which is fine).
Quite right.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2016-09-14 00:24:39 | Re: pg_basebackup wish list |
| Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2016-09-13 22:48:50 | Re: Logical Replication WIP |