| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Abhijit Menon-Sen <ams(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Proposal for changes to recovery.conf API |
| Date: | 2016-11-04 13:35:55 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmoaHpLFqhtMtqFG3WNzKd3U-VR22Q5VbG5zF+DOY9H=TCg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 6:04 AM, Michael Paquier
<michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 1, 2016 at 11:31 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> I liked Heikki's suggestion (at some point quite a while ago now) of
>> recovery_target = 'xid 123' or recovery_target='lsn 0/723' or
>> whatever.
>
> My vote goes for having two separate parameters, because as we know
> that there will be always two fields in this parameter, ...
That's not even true today: when the target is immediate, it has no
associated parameter value. And who knows what the future may hold?
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2016-11-04 13:42:32 | Re: Gather Merge |
| Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2016-11-04 13:35:21 | Re: Improve hash-agg performance |