Re: a raft of parallelism-related bug fixes

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: a raft of parallelism-related bug fixes
Date: 2015-10-22 14:44:53
Message-ID: CA+Tgmoa0NRo=MGD0FPmYnPhVtpmks00k3WXSMfQYiSGDW+L60g@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 9:04 AM, Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> ... node *need* not be parallel aware?

Yes, thanks. Committed that way.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2015-10-22 14:46:00 Re: a raft of parallelism-related bug fixes
Previous Message Robbie Harwood 2015-10-22 14:36:19 Re: [PATCH v3] GSSAPI encryption support