| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)bluetreble(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Sawada Masahiko <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Proposal : REINDEX xxx VERBOSE |
| Date: | 2015-03-13 13:23:15 |
| Message-ID: | CA+Tgmoa-QssQ5CzT3s3SN-p-dv8zXLQoZ4JbxkytsuomSB4yyA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 8:57 AM, Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)bluetreble(dot)com> wrote:
> Yeah, that doesn't sound like a good tradeoff compared to making people type
> some extra ()s. :(
>
> We should at least support ()s on the other commands though, so that we're
> consistent.
I think we've been moving slowly in that direction, but it's not this
patch's job to accelerate that transition.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2015-03-13 13:30:27 | Re: Parallel Seq Scan |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2015-03-13 13:22:24 | Re: Parallel Seq Scan |