Re: INSERT ... ON CONFLICT {UPDATE | IGNORE}

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>
Cc: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Anssi Kääriäinen <anssi(dot)kaariainen(at)thl(dot)fi>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)ymail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: INSERT ... ON CONFLICT {UPDATE | IGNORE}
Date: 2014-12-05 18:37:12
Message-ID: CA+Tgmoa+1Ychm9x8fx6x2t7J=WBP7+bgnYRCM39FTiT5u-qgrA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 1:07 PM, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com> wrote:
> Agreed. Importantly, we won't have painted ourselves into a corner
> where we cannot add it later, now that RETURNING projects updates
> tuples, too (V1.5 established that).

Yeah, it seems fine to postpone that to a later version, as long as we
haven't painted ourselves into a corner.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stephen Frost 2014-12-05 18:37:59 Re: Role Attribute Bitmask Catalog Representation
Previous Message Peter Geoghegan 2014-12-05 18:07:17 Re: INSERT ... ON CONFLICT {UPDATE | IGNORE}