Re: [HACKERS] Request - repeat value of \pset title during \watch interations

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Request - repeat value of \pset title during \watch interations
Date: 2016-03-21 15:03:20
Message-ID: CA+TgmoZv_tOow2yRQCiKChGPTZ7artnyoR6xwOvg3n1mr_7uOg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

On Sun, Mar 20, 2016 at 9:31 AM, Michael Paquier
<michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> And the patch attached gives the following output:
> With title:
> =# \watch 1
> Watch every 1s Sun Mar 20 22:28:38 2016
> popo
> a
> ---
> 1
> (1 row)
>
> And without title:
> Watch every 1s Sun Mar 20 22:29:31 2016
>
> a
> ---
> 1
> (1 row)

And does everybody agree that this is a desirable change?

As for the patch itself, you could replace all this:

+ /*
+ * Take into account any title present in the user setup as a part of
+ * what is printed for each iteration by using it as a header.
+ */
+ if (myopt.title)
+ {
+ title_len = strlen(myopt.title);
+ title = pg_malloc(title_len + 50);
+ head_title = pg_strdup(myopt.title);
+ }
+ else
+ {
+ title_len = 0;
+ title = pg_malloc(50);
+ head_title = pg_strdup("");
+ }

...with:

head_title = pg_strdup(myopt.title != NULL ? myopt.title : "");
title_len = strlen(head_title);
title = pg_malloc(title_len + 50);

Better yet, include the + 50 in title_len, and then you don't need to
reference the number 50 again further down.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Scott Marlowe 2016-03-21 15:08:15 Re: PostgreSQL advocacy
Previous Message Adrian Klaver 2016-03-21 15:01:35 Re: [SQL] plan not correct?

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Craig Ringer 2016-03-21 15:11:37 Re: Proposal: Generic WAL logical messages
Previous Message Bert 2016-03-21 14:57:49 Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Support parallel aggregation.