Re: clearing opfuncid vs. parallel query

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: YUriy Zhuravlev <u(dot)zhuravlev(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
Cc: "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: clearing opfuncid vs. parallel query
Date: 2015-10-22 17:25:52
Message-ID: CA+TgmoZtsYk9Ez-BYV9RqhTQyzFdYd+T8ZD2GiMEhaZPFDjEXg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 1:19 PM, YUriy Zhuravlev
<u(dot)zhuravlev(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> wrote:
> And then another question:
> What do you think if the generated equalfuncs.c, copyfuncs.c, readfuncs.c,
> outfuncs.c from XML or JSON?
> In order not to change the code in four places when changing nodes.

It would be more useful, if we're going to autogenerate code, to do it
from the actual struct definitions.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2015-10-22 17:38:36 Re: make Gather node projection-capable
Previous Message Robert Haas 2015-10-22 17:24:32 make Gather node projection-capable