Re: Conflict between REL9_4_STABLE and master branch.

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Uriy Zhuravlev <u(dot)zhuravlev(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
Cc: "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Conflict between REL9_4_STABLE and master branch.
Date: 2015-06-26 15:36:08
Message-ID: CA+TgmoZqnMn5Mqm9E5OxT23zYWc1+fFHM8WWPSO3a4yY2AHQGw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 11:22 AM, Uriy Zhuravlev
<u(dot)zhuravlev(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> wrote:
> Hello hackers.
>
> I found a strange thing. I hope it's not on purpose.
>
> Example:
> git clone git://git.postgresql.org/git/postgresql.git
> cd postgresql
> git checkout -b remotes/origin/REL9_4_STABLE

This is an awfully strange thing to do. git checkout -b creates a new
branch. Why would you create a new branch with the name
remotes/origin/EDBAS9_4_STABLE? I would just do "git checkout
REL9_4_STABLE" if that's what you want to do.

> git merge master
> MANY CONFLICTS

Well, the stuff we back-patch is going to conflict if it's been
adjusted at all. I think trying to do this is a bad idea.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2015-06-26 15:38:56 Re: Hash index creation warning
Previous Message Robert Haas 2015-06-26 15:28:54 Re: less log level for success dynamic background workers for 9.5