From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | Emre Hasegeli <emre(at)hasegeli(dot)com>, Andreas Karlsson <andreas(at)proxel(dot)se>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Erik Rijkers <er(at)xs4all(dot)nl>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Nicolas Barbier <nicolas(dot)barbier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Claudio Freire <klaussfreire(at)gmail(dot)com>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: BRIN range operator class |
Date: | 2015-04-30 12:41:31 |
Message-ID: | CA+TgmoZk9KsYXpM0x82kzkan3T_LD_xbKcNLM+xMuS7atbcy8g@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Apr 6, 2015 at 5:17 PM, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> Thanks for the updated patch; I will at it as soon as time allows. (Not
> really all that soon, regrettably.)
>
> Judging from a quick look, I think patches 1 and 5 can be committed
> quickly; they imply no changes to other parts of BRIN. (Not sure why 1
> and 5 are separate. Any reason for this?) Also patch 2.
>
> Patch 4 looks like a simple bugfix (or maybe a generalization) of BRIN
> framework code; should also be committable right away. Needs a closer
> look of course.
Is this still pending?
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Pavel Stehule | 2015-04-30 12:46:13 | Re: Loss of some parts of the function definition |
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2015-04-30 12:39:45 | feature freeze and beta schedule |