Re: insufficient qualification of some objects in dump files

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: insufficient qualification of some objects in dump files
Date: 2016-03-18 15:22:56
Message-ID: CA+TgmoZebhrWboY_j1cCmah7uudy0Uok8YaUJTsptRpGbP8sWQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 2:13 AM, Michael Paquier
<michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 5:38 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> Given the lack of any other complaints about this, I'm okay with the
>> approach as presented. (I haven't read the patch in detail, though.)
>
> FWIW, I am still of the opinion that the last patch sent by Peter is
> in a pretty good shape.

Great. I've marked this patch as "Ready for Committer" in the
CommitFest application.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andreas Karlsson 2016-03-18 15:25:02 Re: 2016-03 Commitfest
Previous Message Robert Haas 2016-03-18 15:21:00 Re: silent data loss with ext4 / all current versions