| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Brian Dunavant <brian(at)omniti(dot)com>, PGSQL Mailing List <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Question about partial functional indexes and the query planner |
| Date: | 2014-06-11 13:39:36 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmoZc0xg9bG3Z7fNhaRMwoT-L3eukTiwExuNnr5r7DtwDsA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 7:19 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Given the lack of previous complaints, I'm not sure this amounts to
> a back-patchable bug, but it does seem like something worth fixing
> going forward.
Agreed, although I'd be willing to see us slip it into 9.4. It's
doubtful that anyone will get upset if their query plans change
between beta1 and beta2, but the same cannot be said for released
branches.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Si Chen | 2014-06-11 15:59:56 | what does pg_activity mean when the database is stuck? |
| Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2014-06-11 11:02:49 | Re: Accessing structured datatypes using libpq |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2014-06-11 14:26:15 | Re: Allowing NOT IN to use ANTI joins |
| Previous Message | Kevin Grittner | 2014-06-11 13:24:41 | Re: Inaccuracy in VACUUM's tuple count estimates |