Re: Re: Reusing abbreviated keys during second pass of ordered [set] aggregates

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>
Cc: Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Re: Reusing abbreviated keys during second pass of ordered [set] aggregates
Date: 2016-02-17 10:12:47
Message-ID: CA+TgmoZXtKs=vh9rH+JFHts827EEa754__HG=bmBs3uihqPH1Q@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Dec 23, 2015 at 12:19 PM, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com> wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 2:59 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> OK, so I've gone ahead and committed and back-patched that. Can you
>> please rebase and repost the remainder as a 9.6 proposal?
>
> I attach a rebased patch for 9.6 only.

Committed, except I left out one comment hunk that I wasn't convinced about.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2016-02-17 10:14:50 Re: ALTER ROLE SET/RESET for multiple options
Previous Message Dean Rasheed 2016-02-17 10:05:31 Re: custom function for converting human readable sizes to bytes