Re: Parallel bitmap heap scan

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Haribabu Kommi <kommi(dot)haribabu(at)gmail(dot)com>, Rafia Sabih <rafia(dot)sabih(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, tushar <tushar(dot)ahuja(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Amit Khandekar <amitdkhan(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Parallel bitmap heap scan
Date: 2017-02-13 12:54:16
Message-ID: CA+TgmoZWFTC950cLs1dso9y55Nj26fEGYS6L4GRRQoQie5y9fQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sat, Feb 11, 2017 at 1:41 AM, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> I tried my best, please check the latest patch (0001).

I don't think it's acceptable (or necessary) to move the DSA
definitions into postgres.h. Why do you think you need to do that,
vs. just including dsa.h in a few more places?

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Daniele Varrazzo 2017-02-13 13:37:21 Re: 'text' instead of 'unknown' in Postgres 10
Previous Message Bernd Helmle 2017-02-13 12:34:28 Re: Should we cacheline align PGXACT?