Re: Parallel Index Scans

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: tushar <tushar(dot)ahuja(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Anastasia Lubennikova <lubennikovaav(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Rahila Syed <rahilasyed(dot)90(at)gmail(dot)com>, Prabhat Sahu <prabhat(dot)sahu(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Parallel Index Scans
Date: 2016-12-23 12:08:34
Message-ID: CA+TgmoZBR=LAPwOHz4iLvoouLNsQp_rEcEWe_Gsed-j6p+5BEw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Dec 23, 2016 at 1:35 AM, tushar <tushar(dot)ahuja(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
> In addition to that, we run the sqlsmith against PG v10+PIS (parallel index
> scan) patches and found a crash but that is coming on plain PG v10
> (without applying any patches) as well

So why are you reporting it here rather than on a separate thread?

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message tushar 2016-12-23 12:14:54 Re: Parallel Index Scans
Previous Message Amit Langote 2016-12-23 11:33:12 Re: Minor correction in alter_table.sgml