Re: Minor comment edits in nodeGather.c

On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 1:06 AM, Amit Langote
<Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> wrote:
> While going through nodeGather.c, I noticed portions of the file header
> comment that may have been obsoleted by recent revisions of the relevant
> parellelism code. For example, there is a reference to PartialSeqScan node
> which did not make it into the tree. Attached fixes it. Also, wondering if
> the semantics of Gather node is that of Scan or more generic Plan? That is
> to ask whether the following edit makes sense:
>
> * nodeGather.c
> - * Support routines for scanning a plan via multiple workers.
> + * Support routines for getting the result from a plan via multiple
> + * workers.
> *

Well I think "scanning a plan" is clear enough even if it's
technically a Scan. But I agree the second change is needed.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company